Independent film & TV review site. We publish criticism and information only. Nothing on this site is downloadable and we host no software or install files. Read our disclaimer
Enter a critic score and an audience score and see exactly how big the split is, what kind of split it is, and what that pattern usually predicts.
Type the two numbers you already have: a tomatometer and a popcornmeter, a Metacritic critic score and a user score, whatever you are looking at. The split is measured and named as you type.
Scores are clamped to 0-100. Nothing you type leaves the page.
A gap describes the two numbers you entered, not the film. Aggregator scores move as votes arrive, and neither figure is audited for review bombing.
Every big aggregator hands you two numbers for the same film: one from professional critics, one from everybody else. Most people glance at the first and ignore the second, which wastes the informative half. A film sitting at 92 with critics and 91 with audiences is a known quantity. A film at 92 and 54 is doing something divisive, and knowing that before you commit two hours is worth more than either figure on its own. This tool takes the pair you already have and does one small job well: it measures the distance between them and names the pattern.
The arithmetic is a single subtraction, critic score minus audience score, so there is no cleverness being smuggled in. The value sits entirely in the interpretation. A gap of thirty points in one direction describes a very different evening from a gap of thirty points in the other, and the quiet middle band, where both camps agree, is the most trustworthy signal available. Nothing here needs an account, a login or your viewing history. Type two numbers and read the answer.
When critics sit twenty-five points or more above the audience, you are usually looking at a formally ambitious or deliberately difficult film: something that rewards patience, punishes distraction, or refuses the comfortable shape a mainstream audience expects. Craft gets rewarded by people who watch a hundred films a year and are hungry for the unfamiliar, while the same choices read as slow, cold or confusing to someone who wanted a night’s entertainment. Neither reaction is wrong. Go in if you like being challenged and are happy to meet a film on its own terms; wait for a night when you want comfort instead.
Push the same distance the other way and the pattern flips. An audience score well above the critic score almost always means a franchise entry, a fan-service sequel, a horror crowd-pleaser or a comfort film that does exactly what its audience came for and has no interest in doing anything else. Reviewers on their twelfth superhero film of the year find diminishing returns; the fan who waited three years for this one does not. If you are the target audience, the critics were never your sample, and the audience number is the one that describes your evening.
The middle bands matter more than they look. A ten-to-twenty-five point lead in either direction is a mild split, and it usually means a film has more craft than its marketing let on, or delivers more pleasure than its premise suggested. Under ten points the two camps broadly agree, which is the least exciting result this tool can produce and also the most reliable: when critics and crowds land in the same place, that number tends to hold up over time. The consensus figure under the bar is a useful sanity check on either score.
Audience scores are easier to move than critic scores, for two well-known reasons. The first is review bombing, where a coordinated group floods a title with the lowest possible score to punish it for something that has nothing to do with whether it is any good: a casting decision, a political reading, a release delay. You can often spot it in the shape of the data rather than the average. A sudden cliff of one-star ratings inside a day or two, a surge of accounts that have rated almost nothing else, and a gap that opens before most people could plausibly have seen the film are all warning signs, and our guide to why critics and audiences disagree goes through them in detail.
The second reason is a mismatch in what the score even measures. A critic score is usually a percentage of positive reviews rather than an average of ratings, so a film that everyone calls a solid three stars can outscore a film that half the critics adored and half found unwatchable. Audience scores mix genuine viewers with people voting on a trailer, and the two are impossible to separate from the outside. This tool cannot audit any of that, so it takes you at your word and does the subtraction, which is worth saying plainly. It is a description of the numbers you typed, not a verdict on the film.
There is a statistical reason for caution too. When both scores sit in the middle of the scale, roughly forty to sixty, neither sample felt strongly, and the difference between them is being computed from two lukewarm pools of opinion. A fifteen-point gap between 52 and 37 means far less than the same gap between 88 and 73, because in the first case you are measuring the space between two shrugs. The tool flags that situation explicitly rather than letting a tidy number overstate the confidence.
It is also worth remembering what a gap of zero does not tell you. Broad agreement is a statement about how a film landed, not about what it is: an unremarkable comedy and a genuine masterpiece can both sit at 90 and 90. The number cannot tell you whether the tone will suit your mood, whether the ending will frustrate you, or whether the film will be one you are still thinking about next week. Our comparison of the different scoring systems explains why three sites can report three different figures for the same title, and our guide to reading an aggregate rating covers what those figures are actually counting.
The practical use is simple. Before committing to something divisive, check the gap and ask which side of it you normally land on. If you are the person who loved the slow, difficult film everyone else called boring, a critics-ahead gap is a recommendation rather than a warning. If your best evenings are the ones where the crowd was right and the reviewers were sniffy, the reverse gap points at exactly the right shelf. Knowing your own bias turns the split from trivia into a filter you can actually apply.
Once you have decided a title is worth the time, the rest of the site can handle the logistics. The watchlist picker ends the scroll-and-give-up loop when nothing here appeals, the binge-watch calculator tells you what a whole series will cost you in hours, and if you would rather form your own verdict than borrow one, the rating scorecard turns your reaction into a number you can defend.